2FP Blog

Morals

It’s Time to Ratify. November 17th, 2010

Over the past several months, you’ve heard us talk a lot about the New Strategic Arms Treaty (START) — how it will make us safer now and take an important step in the right direction, toward a future free from nuclear weapons.

But earlier this week, Senator Jon Kyl stalled the vote. For reasons that remain strangely elusive and vague, a handful of senators are dragging their feet on a treaty that has the unanimous support of our military leadership, the judgment of our national security establishment, and strong public support. If this obstructionism wins out and our leaders don’t vote in the next 6 weeks, the treaty will return to committee next year, erasing the progress made in the last 7 months. As a result, New START may not be ratified.

The treaty is now at a make or break point, and there are serious consequences for inaction. Failing to ratify the treaty will undermine U.S. leadership on nonproliferation, leave us without “boots on the ground” inspectors for the Russian arsenal, jeopardize future arms control agreements, and hinder international cooperation on common threats, such as the containment of Iran’s nuclear program—not to mention the failure to reduce Cold War-sized nuclear arsenals by about one-third.

Nuclear weapons demand a level of seriousness that rises above partisanship. Christians should respond with an adequate level of moral gravity: if we don’t have the courage and responsibility to speak truth in this climate of fear, foolishness, and misinformation, who will?

Please, take five minutes and call your Senators and tell them you support the ratification of the New START treaty in 2010.

More Than Moralism: How Values Matter to Nuclear Security July 23rd, 2010

Earlier this week, Tyler was privileged to give the Interfaith Lecture in the Hall of Philosophy at the renowned Chautauqua Institute in New York. The lecture, titled “More Than Moralism: How Values Matter to Nuclear Security,” was part of a series of lectures this week at Chautauqua on the issue of nuclear disarmament — including speakers such as former Senator Sam Nunn, nuclear security expert Joseph Cirincione, and the Rev. Jim Wallis.

Elizabeth Lunblad of The Chautauquan Daily wrote a short piece on the lecture, “Way to End Nuclear Age is Through Moral Activism,” highlighting Tyler’s presentation and the intersection between morality, faith, and nuclear weapons:

Does morality make a difference to the question of nuclear weapons and security? The answer, he said, is a resounding, self-evident “yes.”

“No matter how hard we try, we can’t imagine an amoral security. We can imagine an immoral security, but not an amoral one. This is because security, properly understood, is the means to an end. It’s not an end unto itself,” he said.

Security seeks an end that is unavoidably moral because it is the work of preserving human society from an external threat, and all society has some form of moral architecture that it is internally accountable toward, Wigg-Stevenson said.

If you’d like to read the text of Tyler’s lecture, you can download the PDF here.